Michael Broukhim

Go west, young man

8 notes &

companies who can build authentic, honest, open, collaborative relationships with consumers are significantly more profitable (and sustainably profitable) than companies who treat consumers deceptively, antagonistically, and manipulatively.

Why (Real) Relationships Matter - Umair Haque (via fred-wilson)

Some of the comments (one quoted below) and the link to the original Economist article are as interesting as the qutoe selected out here. I think the dichotomy laid out is a bit extreme. A company can certainly choose not to be ‘open’ or chose not to develop ‘collaborative relationships’ (think: Apple?) but still not treat consumers ‘deceptively’ or ‘manipulatively.’ We’ve treid to be extremely transparent with TotSpot, and I think on balance, it’s benefited us. Though sometimes competitive pressures require selective secracy as well… not sure there’s a definite answer here.

Perhaps the key word is ‘sustainably’ - I could buy the idea that over a sufficiently long time horizon, manipulative yet profitable tactics fail because they are exposed by markets. Curious to hear other thoughts out there…

Here’s one quote from one of the comments:

“I would be interested in seeing the research as well. Numerous consumer brands have sub-brands to hide the fact that a large company is making the product. Think of all of the micro-brew beers that are really just another product from a larger brewery. This has proved very profitable to date.” - Posted by Jared Brandt

  1. zonio1 reblogged this from fred-wilson
  2. upim reblogged this from fred-wilson
  3. mbb reblogged this from fred-wilson
  4. sankit reblogged this from fred-wilson
  5. runkeeper reblogged this from fred-wilson
  6. fred-wilson posted this